5 equal awards “1/5 of Meter” were given to:
LATVIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF ARTS („Processoffice ir Andrius Skiezgelas Architecture“; (Processoffice) Vytautas Biekša, Rokas Kilčiauskas, Marius Kanevičius, Giedrius Špogis, Ježi Stankevič, Austė Kuliešiūtė, Miglė Nainytė, Giedrė Datenytė, Mantas Petraitis, Sandra Dumčiūtė, Povilas Marozas, Sandra Šlepikaitė; (Andrius Skiezgelas architecture) Andrius Skiezgelas, Gilma Teodora Gylytė, Rasa Mizaraitė)
Jury‘s comment: The jury have selected this project for a new and original concept of integrating archives and normally „hidden” function zones in museum as exposition. This provides outstanding entertainment and educational qualities for visitors. The jury underlines very good detail of the building as well as clear distinction and dialogue between the old and the new.
ART & SYNERGY HOUSES INTEGRA (Lijanos Petrikėnės grupė, „Vilniaus architektūros studija“, arch. Lijana Petrikėnė, Ignas Lukauskas, Džiugas Kisielius)
Jury‘s comment: The jury found interesting contemporary architecture integrated in a very sensitive way with country side landscape. Outstanding program and organic and functional use of triangle forms that normally doesn’t seem to be that functional. Good architectural detail and high quality materials used in a very modest way.
VILLA ON THE VALLEY (“Arches”, arch. Edgaras Neniškis, Rolandas Liola, Arūnas Liola, Margarita Kaučikaitė, Enrika Geštautaitė)
Jury‘s comment: Example of extremely well done individual house in terms of respecting the landscape, use of contemporary elegant material, high quality detail and interesting spatial plan organization. Architects designed a flow of outdoor and indoor spaces that correspond with each other.
RESIDENTIAL QUARTER „RASU NAMAI“ (Paleko ARCHstudija“: arch. Rolandas Palekas, Bartas Puzonas, Petras Išora + „PLAZMA“: arch. Rytis Mikulionis, Gytis Vaitkevičius, Povilas Daugis)
Jury‘s comment: Respectful and modest answer for the outstanding landscape and historical context. Dialogue between floating and settled forms of detached housing being integrated in surrounding forest. Intelligent variations of the apartments is a precious example and contrary to „copy paste” architecture. Sensitive play with different wood patterns makes the complex interesting and original.
OFFICE BUILDING “K29“ („Archinova“ + „PLH Arkitekter“, arch. Aleksandras Gvildys, Antanas Gvildys, Steen Enrico Andersen, Virginija Kazlauskaitė, Sandra Paškevičienė, Edimtas Šimeliūnas).
Jury‘s comment: High quality and extremely technically developed office building. The jury underlines elegant and transparent interior of the building. Purity of design of the whole building as well as very good detail.
The jury dedicated 2 honorable mentions to:
ONE FAMILY HOUSE IN VILNIUS (arch. Laurynas Žakevičius ir Erika Gumuliauskaitė)
Jury‘s comment: The jury found interesting domestic and warm character achieved in the inner space of the house by integrating old wall and play with new architecture.
RESIDENTIAL QUARTER BASANAVICIAUS 9A. („Paleko ARCHstudija“. Arch. Rolandas Palekas, Alma Palekienė, Dalia Uogintė, Bartas Puzonas, Sandra Šlepikaitė)
Jury‘s comment: An interesting and well done example of modest and simple residential estate integrated into historical surrounding. Sensitive reaction to landscape and urban context.
Other projects that the jury visited as the most promising candidates for the Awards:
FAMILY HOUSE IN PALANGA. G. Natkevičius ir partneriai. Arch. Tomas Kuleša, Adomas Rimšelis, Rasa Diškevičiūtė, Gintautas Natkevičius
LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES. FACULTY OF PUBLIC HEALTH. G. Natkevičius ir partneriai. Arch. Adomas Rimšelis, Dovilė Bukauskaitė, Rasa Diškevičiūtė, Gintautas Natkevičius.
DRUSKININKAI K.DINEIKA WELLNESS PARK. Vilniaus architekturos studija. Arch. Kęstutis Pempė, Viktoras Gricius, Aurimas Syrusas, Vytautas Lukoševičius. Želdynai: Dėja Želvienė. Konstr. Deividas Kavoliūnas, Alfonsas Vaškevičius
THE DUNE HOUSE. Archispektras. Arch. Aidas Kalinauskas, Vaidas Tamošiūnas
|
|
|
